Sunday, March 18, 2007

FILMFARE Awards: a Breeding Ground of Mediocrity

Few days back a Professor* of a business school in India, told me that they are on their way to become a Harvard Business School. I asked how? The answer was comical. We are building a similar campus. Well is it the campus that makes Harvard Business School what it is now. Or the business schools that have got similar success in research and MBA programs emulated its campus? The answer is NO. It’s the quality of teachers and students that make the difference. Teachers like Porter, Christensen, Ghemawat, and Nohria, creating Ranjay Gulati, Rajat Gupta etc.


This year the filmfare emulated the Oscars. Well in terms of dress code and stage design. It ends pretty much there! In the Oscars we don’t see Tobey McGuire, Christen Bell, Brandon Routh getting nominated in the best actors categiry (be it leading or supporting) for their portrayal of Spiderman, Batman and Superman, respectively. Let alone win it. We also don’t see Viggo Mortenssen getting nominated for his portrayal of Aragon in Lord of the Rings. Not that the actors are short of merit, but the roles and its attributes did not qualify for the best actors in leading and supporting categories. So despite The “Return of the King”(the third installment of the Trilogy of J.R.R.Tolkien’s Screen play adaptation of “ Lord of the Rings”) banging twelve Oscars, the actors who got the awards for acting were Sean Penn and Tim Robbins in Clint Eastwood’s “The Mystic River”.


This year Hrittik Roshan gets the leading actors award in Filmfare. Now he could be a talented actor, but does his role in Dhoom 2 entail him with the the India version of Academy of Motion Picture, Arts and Sciences? In my view the answer is NO. Such recognition in fact even the nomination of Sharhruk Khan's portrayal of a beaten football player is nothing than being a breeding ground of mediocrity. Let’s forget about being a mediocre actor anyone looking at the penalty shot can tell that those are not a footballer’s legs. In the Indian film industry the actor’s persona becomes the prime portrayal in any character they intend to play. The character itself becomes a faint shadow of the actors’ persona. And recognition of such average quality work makes the Filmfare, a breeding ground of mediocrity. We don’t see any similarity of Maximus and Professor Nash, played by Russel Crowe, we also don’t see any similarity Forrest Gump and Michael Sullivan (Road to Perdition), both played by Tom Hanks. But Emperor Ashoka and the Footballer looked the same.


One cannot become Harvard by emulating the campus; similarly, one cannot become the Oscars with black and white theme. There is more to the game than what meets the eye.


* PROFESSOR: The Word professor in prestigious academic institution is synonymous with an indisputable knowledge in a field. It is used to refer to someone who has contributed to the development of a field if not creating it. The word here often means a job of teaching in a college and taking tuitions explaining what is written in textbooks.

11 comments:

Anonymous said...

Well done Avi...yet another thought provoking blogg.

Anonymous said...

hey Avi,
well-written, i must say. SRK ka toh band baja diya aapne! i agree, thr was very little dfrnc b/w emperor asoka and d footballer portrayed in KANK by SRK, except 4d clothes and hairstyle he SPORTED. frm that point of view, r actors need 2 intensify thr research a LOT more. anyway, as far as OSCARS, vis-a-vis Filmfare, lemme tell u, that i watched a bit of BOTH. although the filmfare this yr tried 2 emulate the oscars, they wrnt comparable at all - not even in terms of dress code, stage management or 4 that matter attendance. wat was amar singh doing in the filmfare? he had no business bng thr...! u dont gt 2 c tag-alongs in d oscars do u?

i agree with u overall... however, thr ARE actors like amitabh, aamir, irfan, KK etc who DO try 2 live the character.

avimanyu said...

Well the die hard supporters of Indian Film industurt may say Amar sing at Film fare = Al Gore in Oscars. But in reality, its tax saving scams and commodity (actress) sharing...I hope you got me.

Anonymous said...

well Al Gore only got 2 b thr at the Oscars 2 collect d award for AN INCOVENIENT TRUTH. he had DUE reason 2b thr...! amar singh came 2d filmfare for..........well we all know dont we..?

avimanyu said...

ofcourse....we do.

a big yawn said...

Human wants are unlimited, with limited resources: You cant reach the moon by guzzling a bottle of Jack Daniels.
And this is what lead to mediocrity.
well as the old cliche goes: Rome was not build in one day and no body is perfect.
Bollywood is mediocure as it tries to emulate hollywood, without its class and sauveness( i dont know if there is word like that) where hollywood is medicocure for its hypocratic attitude: It does not take a rocket scientist to figure out why a Denzel Washington got the oscar for best actor, for his worst ever performance of a life time, he has been denied the oscar for movies like Hurricane.. but gets it for Training Day..where there is Russel Crowe waiting for his oscar speech for being John Nash. Its irony Russel got it for Gladiator when Denzel deserved it for hurricane.. but is it not Mediocrity as well..
mediocrity is astage that u need to cross to reach excellence.. no body is born excellent.. everybody learns.. moves up from bad to good..
The problem is not mediocrity ..but the problem is stagnation at mediocrity.. and i stand by bollywood( even i agree the best movies dont get the awards) that its tried to move on from the zatang shows to a black tie affair

avimanyu said...

Nicely writte,

The drivers for the mediocrity are different in Hollywood VS bollywood. In India its about the choosing the Least worts amon a sample of worsts. In Hollywood aklthough the Meritorious ones are nominated but often don't win coz of political dogmatism. Like "Hollywood never praises colored people". So lets give Denzel the award this time. Although he has dazelled us with great performances w/o winning an award.

At least Russel Crow was named as a nominee. In Bollywood such a performance is impossible. I still remember Le Vita e bella (life is beautiful) won the best picture despite being a foreign film.

Anonymous said...

Emperor Ashoka, the Footballer, Raj Aryan (Mohabbatein), the Don (remake), Devdas...... just the same vine in different bottles...n not even vintage at that!! Indian cinema 'd have to undergo a paradigm shift to even come close to the likes of Hollywood blockbusters. But I don't think that Bollywood is ready for any dramatic changes for the better (at least in the near future) .... its still likely to remain in the mould of skimpy heroine outfits n item numbers. Campuses without intellectual capital, displays of skin in item numbers .... feels as if most of this country 'd never grow out of the wannabe stage its passing through.

avimanyu said...

Thanks, buddy that was a great comment. Well you have rightly observed. India is embracing the worst of Western cultures and will be trapped in mediocrity. If youy see carefully my last two bolgs point towards the same theme " mediocrity".

iHatEtiTo said...

mate, hold your horses for a moment, i will have to be a critic of your thoughts in this one.
mediocrity is another thing, and bollywood is another. if you say that films reflect a country's culture, then hollywood isnt a very great example of what the USA really is.
the two are basically different genres - when you compare hollywood and bollywood you are actually drawing a comparison between western classical and indipop - in that order.
one's taste might not suit the other, and it can be the other way round too.
personally, i like bollywood movies - especially of the govinda kind - for a simple reason; its a great way to unwind. on a dull saturday afternoon following a hectic working week when your mind doesnt just wish to think a anymore - would you prefer watching "the butterfly effect" or "die another day"? dont get me wrong in here, and i will try not to be too explicit - but lust is also a mortal sin present in us all. being social animals we cant express that in effect all the time, so a vent in the form of a hindi movie helps. also dont forget, we have had hindi movies like "black" in the very near future - very classy indeed. then there are movies with social messages - "lage raho munna bhai" to name one. ofcourse, krrish can never be batman, look at the message coming across.
ah! ofcourse, item numbers and bar girls in skimpy outfits - hindi movies these days arent just complete without them..... but how many of us actually get to see that kind of environment in our society? if you talk about discos, then avi, surely having seen the western culture, you would agree that our discos are not half as profane as those in the west - where they dont have this on their films as well.
wake up men, bollywood does not show reality - in fact far from it.... bollywood represent the human dreams on screen - dreams of being rich, famous, successful, swanky, sexy, macho - you name it. these are dreams - not to be confused with reality.
i hope you understand - raise your queries and i will try to clarify

Unknown said...

Avimanyu,
Kudos for these thoughtful writings.I do agree on your thoughts on this FILMFARE subject. The Indian Film Industry does tend to lean heavily upon the "No biz like show biz" credo. Sense and sensebility are on another plane of existence for most of "them".